World Cyber wars are most feared along with suicidal lone wolf aggression. Those who stockpile and threaten with atomic bombs and are enough to use them would be exterminated in mutual destruction, making them absolute.
So why not eliminate all of them as President Reagan suggested? Why not concentrate on saving Earth and its people from radical war-tore climate change instead of the old slash and burn government policy. Wars are the largest gas guzzlers and cause more carbon than anything else
Dear Ones,
Meanwhile why does the United States try to overrule international law by dominating the world with toxic military bases, over 2,0000, including those abandoned ones still contaminating foreign lands as well as in America. Their danger is great and there is no safety in them. Taxpayers are forced to pay billions of dollars annually for foreign defense in bases even though there's no safety or security in war.
American troops and their families are at risk of death and health in an environment of contaminating chemicals, radioactive emissions and cancerous conditions. Domestic defense is quintessential, but not imperial dominance in the world causing resentment and retaliation.
Here is a smattering of reasons against foreign industrial military bases.
First of all, U.S. imperial power worldwide is resented and makes foreigners hate America. This happened September 11, 2015 when Saudi Arabia used U.S. planes against Washington, D.C. and New York City after a Muslim warning about attacking these sites (as they funded the atrocity) if U.S. military bases weren't eliminated on their land.
Would the U.S. allow foreign military bases in America? I saw the crawl announcement on TV and wondered why President Bush didn't even try to negotiate a settlement. Cause and effect–911. When there's a lopsided playing board in the game of war, there resentment and retaliation will forever harbor.
Helene Smith (Mame),
World Enlightened News (W.E.N.)
